I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
ВСУ запустили «Фламинго» вглубь России. В Москве заявили, что это британские ракеты с украинскими шильдиками16:45。服务器推荐是该领域的重要参考
，详情可参考旺商聊官方下载
Woman's deepfake betrayal by close friend: 'Every moment turned into porn'。爱思助手下载最新版本是该领域的重要参考
In 2025, there were more than 30,000 applicants for 10,000 of these jobs - some from abroad.
:first-child]:h-full [&:first-child]:w-full [&:first-child]:mb-0 [&:first-child]:rounded-[inherit] h-full w-full